Archive for May, 2009

Itoochuu 7itoo.9965 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

May 31, 2009

No. 546

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     November 13, 1941

TO: Manila                                                                                          No number.

(Gogai.)

(Tokyo to Manila # 363.)

Re your # 756[a].

Retransmittng as follows:

# 363[a]

The Asama Maru will take on 450 tons of Diesel oil, 1000 tons of water, fruit, vegetables, etc. there. The head office of the N.Y.K. have requested you to arrange for payment for the same from the fares and freight charges collected from the passengers. Please arrange for this.


[a] See IV, 545.

Trans. 11‑24‑41

No. 547

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     November 9, 1941

TO: Manila                                                                                          # 357.

(Request message.)

Please convey to Lieut. Comdr. Hatakeyama,  http://Louis-j-sheehan.com  Medical Corps.

“You are ordered to return to Japan on the Asama Maru which sails from there about the 20th.”

(Signed)

Secretary to the Minister of the Navy

Trans. 11‑14‑41

No. 548

FROM: Tokyo (Togo)                                                                          November 14, 1941

TO: Manila                                                                                          # 2323.

(Circular.)

There must be members of the trade promotion organization still in the Philippines. As there is no need or scope for their activities in the Philippine Islands at this time, please

A-258

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

induce them to return to Japan on the Asama Maru or the Fuji Maru which has been assigned to the Dutch East Indies for evacuation purposes. Furthermore, please keep in mind ships to the Philippine Islands.

Trans. 11‑24‑41

No. 549

FROM: Tokyo (Togo)                                                                          November 14, 1941

TO: Manila                                                                                          No number.

We find it necessary to discuss some very urgent business here in Tokyo. Please, there­fore, have Consul KIHARA return home immediately, for a short stay, by airplane rather than wait for his scheduled accommodations by steamer.

Trans. 11‑21‑41

No. 550

FROM: Manila (Nihro)                                                                        November 17, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 770.

Request message. From Shirai to the Department of Commerce and Industry of Aichi ken.

Even the Consul General thinks it would be well if we would close this office temporarily and return to Japan because, as a matter of fact, there is no business at present.

Please wire instructions.

Trans. 11‑26‑41

No. 551

FROM: Manila                                                                                     November 15, 1941

TO: Washington                                                                                   No number.

(Manila to Tokyo, Gogai.)

(Manila to Washington # 83, 14 November.)

Because of a mistake in our telegram of the 14th we are retransmitting as follows:

# 83

Re my # 82[a].

Permits were received on the 14th from the High Commissioner for the two items for which request had been made.

A. The item of the loan.

B. The item of the receipt of the outstanding balance of my allowance and also that of the rest of the staff.

Furthermore in regard to cancellation of the freezing orders in regard to this office, Manila had as yet received no instructions from Washington, however according to your Circular # 288[a], Washington has approved the sum of 25,000 pesos for operating expenses of this

A-259

offices and in addition to that  http://Louis-j-sheehan.com  has approved separate sums for myself and all officials above the grade of clerks. Please wire as to whether  Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire  or not this is so.

Relayed to Tokyo.


[a] Not available.

Trans. 11‑20‑41

No. 552

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     October 21, 1941

TO: Mexico City                                                                                  # 215.

Secret documents for your office and for all the South American offices have been entrusted to Vice Consul Kobayashi who is returning to his post (San Francisco) on the Hikawa Maru which sailed from Yokohama on the 20th. As soon as you have notice of his arrival please arrange to have one of your staff go to San Francisco to get the above documents.

Trans. 10‑22‑41

No. 553

FROM: Mexico City (Miura)                                                                October 23, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 420.

It has quite generally been believed, in the event of the United States becoming involved in the war, that Mexico will either follow their example or at least assume a status similar to being in the war. However, at an informal dinner party I gave on the 21st, former Vice Minister of Communications and Finance Rolland[a] expressed himself outspokenly as to the attitude Mexico should take in the event of war between Japan and the United States. The main points which might be considered representative were as follows:

(1) With the outbreak of war, the United States would immediately occupy Mexican ‑‑‑‑‑ and strategic points within the country and also put forth every effort to strengthen anti‑Axis activities in Mexico. Therefore even though Mexico should not declare war a condition would be brought about in which her relations with Japan would be the same as if war had been declared.

(2) The present government, which was formed to support the United States, naturally is following a course of out‑and‑out cooperation with the United States. (Under present conditions even a Carranza in office could adopt no other policy.) Accordingly, if the United States should ask them to declare war they would likely comply at once. But, as stated above, even without a declaration of war by Mexico their objectives could be realized, and therefore to hold down as much as possible the excitement of the populace, such a demand would likely not be made until it became necessary.

(3) While it is a fact that the populace in general have friendly feelings toward Japan, Mexican politics   Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire  and foreign affairs are now manipulated entirely by the hands of a small number of politicians and military men, who are not worthy to be called military men, and the people are absolutely powerless, and it would be a mistake to expect anything of them.

(4) While it would make some difference in the attitude taken toward resident Japanese, whether or not Mexico declared war, in either case it is hardly to be expected that the Japa­nese would escape hardships and oppression on the pretext of “spies”, fifth columnists, etc.

(5) The only chance of their being any change in Mexico’s present policy would be if Ger­many should gain the supremacy in Europe, and Japan in Asia, while the United States

A-260

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

on the other hand would face a national crisis because of economic breakdown and other reasons.

Relayed to Washington.


[a] M. C. Rolland.

Trans. 10‑28‑41

No. 554

FROM: Mexico City (Miura)                                                                October 25, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 422.

According to a confidential statement made by an executive of the Excelsior newspaper here, the statement on the 24th by Secretary of the Navy Knox in regard to the near approach of a crisis between Japan and America reached the said newspaper office at noon of the same day, and in it was the assertion that there would be “imminent action” in the Far East within 24 hours. However, about two hours later a follow‑up message came through from the Washington Associated Press, based on a request from the Navy Department, that the words “within 24 hours” should be deleted.

Have relayed this to Washington.

Trans. 10‑28‑41

No. 555

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     October 27, 1941

TO: Mexico City                                                                                  No number.

There are no more than eight beds on the Terukawa Maru. They have all been taken and the vessel has already a capacity reservation list.

Besides that ship, there is the Hikawa Maru which is scheduled to sail from Seattle on 4 November. There may also be a possibility of finding space on the President Line vessels sailing from San Francisco to Shanghai where you could make connections. Please choose one or the other course, and upon making a decision, advise this office.

Announce your intention to return home to Japan only after you have made definite arrangements for your passage home.

Trans. 10‑28‑41

No. 556

FROM: Mexico City (Miura)                                                                November 3, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           No number.

1. According to recent advice from San Francisco, in spite of efforts made through various channels, it has been impossible to obtain definite reservations. The only thing that could be done was to be placed on the waiting list and hope for a cancellation by a holder of a reservation. From past experiences, San Francisco advises, these cancellations are not made until right before sailing time—in extreme cases the prospective passenger has only an hour notice. All in all, therefore, chances are very slim that I shall succeed in getting accommoda­tions.

2. Four to five days are required by rail from here to San Francisco. Moreover, about a week should be allowed to make my calls on the President, Foreign Minister, and other officials. Therefore, I would have to announce my intention to return by 14 or 15 November at the

A-261

very latest. If I do so and depart from this country I couldn’t very well come sauntering back again because I could not get ship accommodations in San Francisco.

3. Even assuming that I were successful, by a stroke of good fortune, in finding accommo­dations at San Francisco, supposing there are certain developments in U.S.‑Japanese relations, there is, danger that I would become stranded in Hawaii or in the Philippine Islands.

4. In any event, I, as a Minister of the Imperial Government, would be placed in an exceedingly undignified position, particularly in view of the times and circumstances. There will no doubt be much criticism of the government if any of these eventualities materialize.

5. In the final analysis, therefore, would it not be better to apply openly and directly to the U.S. Government to reserve accommodations, (this, of course, can be done only if there is fair assurance that there will be no sudden change in the situation). As an alternative, would it not be better for me to remain here, although from my standpoint this is an exceed­ingly difficult thing to endure. Under these circumstances, I shall, of course, endeavor to carry out all of your instructions to the best of my ability.

Please advise me of your opinions on this matter.

Trans. 11‑7‑41

No. 557

FROM: Mexico (Miura)                                                                       November 6, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 435.

Re my # 330[a].

1. As I have already reported, the Rayon Distributing Company had its import certificates cancelled by the Economics Department, and on the 10th of this month the system was dispensed with. According to the explanation just given me by the Minister of Economics, hereafter the importation of rayon will take place in a manner totally different from what I reported in my caption message. No subsidy will be given to a controlled distributing company, and the importation of rayon can be carried on at will by anyone who is willing to pay a tariff of one peso per kilogram (hitherto, of the 3 pesos 90 cents went for a subsidy). Thus, the subsidy, system itself is gone. (In a few days this will be published in the official gazette.)

2. The reason why the system of importing rayon was revised in the manner described is that the distributing company, through its system of importation and distribution, never achieved the expected results and that this country is very hard‑up for this material. Less and less is on hand, so finally they just had to let anyone import it from anywhere. Now as I pointed out in my # 399[a], we should be very careful to see that no rayon is transshipped from China here. I even have a report that Itoochuu has shipped some 2,000 cases to Chile. Now I feel that this rayon may be going via Chile and Argentina to this country. Please find out anything you can about this and wire me back.


[a] Not available.

Trans. 11‑12‑41

No. 558

FROM: Mexico (Miura)                                                                       November 9, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 438.

A-262

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

On the 8th the Universal published a telegram from Panama stating that Japan had made a protest against the new trade laws which curtail Japanese business in Panama. The Panamanian (Foreign ?) Office replied that this protest (constituted ?) interference in the internal affairs of Panama. As yet no confirmation from other sources has been received. This had no noticeable effects here.

Cincinnati office 66.cin.2299 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

May 27, 2009

REPORTING AIR ACCIDENTS

According to press accounts from July 1947, Army Air Forces personnel from RAAF were involved in the recovery of an airborne object near Roswell. Therefore, if an air accident report was prepared, it should have been prepared in accordance with Army regulations. According to an Army records management official, in 1947 Army regulations required that air accident reports be maintained permanently. An Air Force official said there was no similar requirement to report a weather balloon crash.

According to an Air Force official who has worked in the records management field since the mid-1940s, air accident reports prepared in July 1947 under Army regulations should have been transferred to Air Force custody in September 1947, when the Air Force was established as a separate service.

The Air Force Safety Agency is responsible for maintaining reports of air accidents. We examined its microfilm records to determine whether any air accidents had been reported in New Mexico during July 1947. We identified four air accidents during this time period.2 All of the accidents involved military fighter or cargo aircraft and occurred after July 8, 1947– the date the RAAF public information office first reported the crash and recovery of a “flying disc” near Roswell. According to the Army Air Forces’ Report of Major Accident, these four accidents occurred at or near the towns of Hobbs, Albuquerque, Carrizozo, and Alamogordo, New Mexico. Only one of the four accidents resulted in a fatality. The pilot died when the aircraft crashed during an attempted take-off. 2 These records do not include information regarding mishaps of air vehicles belonging to civilian or other government agencies. These records also do not include mishaps involving unmanned air vehicles such as remotely piloted aircraft, low-speed cruise missiles, and most balloons.

SEARCH FOR RECORDS

In searching for government records on the Roswell crash, we were particularly interested in identifying and reviewing records of military units assigned to RAAF in 1947–to include the 509th Bomb Group, the 1st Air Transport Unit, the 427th Army Air Force Base Unit, and the 1395th Military Police Company (Aviation).

Document disposition forms obtained from the National Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri, indicate that in 1953, the Walker Air Force Base (formerly RAAF) records officer transferred to the Army’s Kansas City records depository the histories of units stationed at Walker Air Force Base. These histories included the 509th Bomb Group and RAAF for February 1947 through October 1947; the 1st Air Transport Unit for July 1946 through June 1947; and the 427th Army Air Force Base Unit for January 1946 to February 1947. We could not locate any documentation indicating that records of the 1395th Military Police Company (Aviation) were ever retired to the National Personnel Records Center or its predecessor depositories.

The July 1947 history for the 509th Bomb Group and RAAF stated that the RAAF public information office “was kept quite busy . . . answering inquiries on the ‘flying disc,’ which was reported to be in [the] possession of the 509th Bomb Group. The object turned out to be a radar tracking balloon.” By his signature, the RAAF’s commanding officer certified that the report represented a complete and accurate account of RAAF activities in July 1947. (Excerpts from the report are contained in app. I.)

In addition to unit history reports, we also searched for other government records on the Roswell crash. In this regard, the Chief Archivist for the National Personnel Records Center provided us with documentation indicating that (1) RAAF records such as finance and accounting, supplies, buildings and grounds, and other general administrative matters from March 1945 through December 1949 and (2) RAAF outgoing messages from October 1946 through December 1949 were destroyed. According to this official, the document disposition form did not properly indicate the authority under which the disposal action was taken. The Center’s Chief Archivist stated that from his personal experience, many of the Air Force organizational records covering this time period were destroyed without entering a citation for the governing disposition authority. Our review of records control forms showing the destruction of other records–including outgoing RAAF messages for 1950–supports the Chief Archivist’s viewpoint.

During our review of records at FBI headquarters, we found a July 8, 1947, teletype message from the FBI office in Dallas, Texas, to FBI headquarters and the FBI office in Cincinnati, Ohio. An FBI spokesperson confirmed the authenticity of the message.

According to the message, an Eighth Air Force headquarters official had telephonically informed the FBI’s Dallas office of the recovery near Roswell of a hexagonal-shaped disc suspended from a large balloon by cable. The message further stated that the disc and balloon were being sent to Wright Field (now Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio) for examination. According to the Eighth Air Force official, the recovered object resembled a high-altitude weather balloon with a radar reflector. The message stated that no further investigation by the FBI was being conducted. (A copy of the teletype message appears in app. II.)

To follow up on the July 8th message, we reviewed microfilm abstracts of the FBI Dallas and Cincinnati office activities for July 1947.   http://www.blog.ca/user/Beforethebigbang  An abstract prepared by the FBI Dallas office on July 12, 1947, summarized the particulars of the July 8th message. There was no mention in the Cincinnati office abstracts of the crash or recovery of an airborne object near Roswell.  Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

Because the FBI message reported that debris from the Roswell crash was being transported to Wright Field for examination, we attempted to determine whether military regulations existed for handling such debris. We were unable to locate any applicable regulation. As a final step, we reviewed Air Materiel Command (Wright Field) records from 1947 to 1950 for evidence of command personnel involvement in this matter. We found no records mentioning the Roswell crash or the examination by Air Materiel Command personnel of any debris recovered from the crash.

Temporary foreign telegraphic expense 8.tem.uuuy Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

May 16, 2009

No. 378

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                   Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire                         November 4, 1941

TO: Mexico                                                                                         Circular # 353.

(Message to Tokyo # 1034.)

(Part 1 of 4. )

When we view the present situation in the United States, we can see that regardless of the increase in damages to destroyers and merchantmen, the popular mind is not an iota more incensed against Germany; therefore, it is not likely that the government will sever relations with the Reich and invite war. Germany, too, well knows that a bout with the United States would not be to her advantage and will, insofar as possible, refrain from outright war against America. This country is not yet ready to become involved in Europe. She is content with furnishing the maximum material assistance, patrolling the sea, and affording technical aid.

Trans.  11‑15‑41

No. 379

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                                             November 4, 1941

TO: Mexico                                                                                         Circular # 353.

(Message to Tokyo # 1034.)

(Part 2 of 4.)

As the danger of war is not in the immediate offing, the people are all worried about their own problems. Instead of war, they are worried about prices, increased taxes, inflation, and

A-186

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

other such matters which affect their immediate welfare. By and large, the government officials, too, seem inclined to wish to keep England, of course, and then as many other countries as possible, fighting; and then when the last extremity is reached, to jump in and seize the victory. Therefore, whether it turns out to be a five or a ten‑year war does not seem to make any difference. The United States is aiding Russia today, but that is just because she can use Russia to her own ends; it does not by any means signify that she likes Communism.

Trans.  11‑15‑41

No. 380

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                                             November 4, 1941

TO: Mexico                                                                                         Circular # 353.

(Message to Tokyo # 1034.)

(Part 3 of 4. )

When it comes to economic pressure on us Japanese, however, the officials have the full backing of the people. They all seem to think that their present strength in the Atlantic is sufficient for national defense and for protection against war. They seem to believe that there is not much to worry about in the southern Pacific, since British, American, and Nether­landish military strength is increasing gradually in that area. In the face of Japan’s dauntless attitude, the Americans do not show the slightest fear. Furthermore, it has also been published that conferences already are under way to supply the ABCD nations with war materials, and this process of fortifying universal allies flourishes from day to day.

Trans.  11-15‑41

No. 381

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                                             November 4, 1941http://LOUIS-J-SHEEHAN.INFO

TO: Mexico                                                                                         Circular # 353.

(Message to Tokyo # 1034.)

(Part 4 of 4.)

Ah, but when it comes to military men, they do not share this optimism; for

(1) Well do they know that English morale is not as good as reported. Full well do they know that after the fall of Russia, England may make peace with Germany.

(2) The Mediterranean Sea is in grave peril. The reason why CHURCHILL talked personal­ly with the President was doubtless because he saw that the United States was tending to over‑stress the Pacific Ocean, and he wished the President to know the gravity of the situa­tion in the Atlantic and to warn him that the real danger lies in the Atlantic.

(3) I am sure that the officials know full well what a nuisance a war in the Pacific would be. Lately it has been said in editorials that if it comes to the question of war, the questions of where troops are to be stationed and the moment for striking will be chosen quickly when the whole situation has been taken into consideration.

For your information.

Trans.  11‑15‑41

A-187

No. 382

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     November 4, 1941

TO: Washington                                                                                   # 728.

Re messages from San Francisco to the Minister # 71[a] and your # 1030[b].

In spite of the fact that arrangements had been made with the United States Government concerning the schedule of ships carrying mail, an undesirable effect was created by the unexpected examination and (sorting ?) of the mail on the night before the sailing of the Tatsuta Maru.

It appears that the American understanding of the arrangements and ours differ, therefore, it is suggested that representations clarifying the situation be made so that the loading of mail may be smoothly carried out in the cases of the Taiyō Maru and the Hikawa Maru.


[a] Not available.

[b] Not available.

Trans.  11-17‑41

No. 383

FROM: San Francisco (Muto)                                                              November 5, 1941

TO: Washington                                                                                   Circular # 277.

(San Francisco to Tokyo # 274.)

Re my # 263[a].

‑‑‑‑‑[b], attached to ‑‑‑‑‑[b], who we have been using for propaganda here, is being investigat­ed regarding Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire   his connection with ‑‑‑‑‑[b] and our connection with this matter. He is registered as a foreign correspondent for the ‑‑‑‑‑[b] and we have stated that he is paid for this through us.


[a] Not available.

[b] DoD comment: Names and identifying information withheld.

Trans.  11‑25‑41

No. 384

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                                             November 5, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1039.

Re your Circular # 2222[a].

Sensitivity of JLG 415.105 kc broadcast to here was fairly good and occasionally we could hear it. However, from 8 p.m. on, interference from other powerful stations was bad and sensitivity was poor. We will check this on successive nights. The sensitivity of other wave lengths was negligible.

The sensitivity of JLG 415.105 kc broadcast to South America was excellent here from 6 to 8 p.m. on successive nights and reception was excellent.


[a] See IV, 360.

Trans.  11‑7‑41

A-188

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

No. 385

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     November 7, 1941

TO: Washington                                                                                   # 744.

(In 2 parts, complete.)

Re your # 1020[a].

We are wiring the distribution of the October and November salaries (to the official in charge of accounts) and the secondhttp://LOUIS-J-SHEEHAN.INFO and third period allowances to the various offices as follows: Please wire this to the various offices concerned.

Salaries and expenses of the personnel of the Embassy in Washington. (The unit is in yen.)

The Ambassador                                                                        13,200.00

Iguchi                                                                                         6,469.54

Okumura                                                                                     4,185.79

Matsudaira                                                                                  4,924.35

Terazaki                                                                                       5,493.75

Iriki                                                                                              2,053.32

Takagi                                                                                          2,053.32

Hoshida                                                                                      1,906.64

Horiuchi                                                                                     3,211.52

Fujita                                                                                           1,992.66

Yamamoto                                                                                   1,760.00

Fujiyama                                                                                      1,966.58

Inagawa                                                                                       1,966.58

Ando                                                                                          1,966.58

Maeda                                                                                         1,466.64

Okaniwa                                                                                     1,466.64

Nakajima                                                                                     1,466.64

Hori                                                                                             2,216.88

Yamamoto                                                                                  2,125.88

Kajiwara                                                                                      2,198.48

Enseki                                                                                         1,320.00

Honjo                                                                                          1,584.00

Arita                                                                                           1,584.00

Nishihori                                                                                     1,584.00

Total                                                                                          70,062.79

Operating expenses, (Unit in dollars).Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

Foreign diplomatic establishments.

  1. A. Actual expense                                                     3,475.92
  2. (3rd period) B. Transfer expense                                                 5,500.00
  3. (3rd period) C. Entertainment expense                                        1,000.00
  4. D. Telegraphic expense                                           10,000.00
  5. D. Temporary foreign telegraphic expense                5,000.00
  6. E. Miscellaneous                                                        1,200.00
  7. B. 3rd period                                                                500.00
  8. D. Emergency telegraphic expense                          18,000.00

Total                                                                        44,675.92

New York

Morishima                                                                                   6,949.20

Inoye                                                                                           4,312.00

Hirazawa                                                                                     3,490.64

A-189

Kondo                                                                                         3,827.52

Amano                                                                                         2,901.94

Mori                                                                                             2,874.64

Nakazawa                                                                                    1,760.00

Hayashida                                                                                    2,216.88

Watanabe                                                                                     2,198.48

Saiga                                                                                            2,053.28

Total                                                                                          32,584.58

Foreign diplomatic establishments.

  1. A.                                                                                                4,026.00
  2. B. (3rd period)                                                                             3,650.00
  3. C. (3rd period)                                                                                525.00
  4. F. Rent(1/2 Year)                                                                       11,500.00
  5. D.                                                                                                3,600.00
  6. D. Temporary foreign                                                                  1,500.00
  7. E.                                                                                                 1,200.00
  8. D. Emergency                                                                              4,000.00

Total                                                                                          30,001.00

Chicago

Mori                                                                                            3,107.30

Uchida                                                                                         2,053.28

Ishida                                                                                           2,673.60

Kawabata                                                                                     1,611.84 http://LOUIS-J-SHEEHAN.INFO

Total                                                                                            9,446.02

Foreign diplomatic establishments.

  1. A.                                                                                                1,464.00
  2. B. (3rd period)                                                                             1,500.00
  3. C. (3rd period)                                                                                250.00
  4. F. (Last half of year)                                                                    4,329.00
  5. 1,500.00
  6. D. Temporary foreign                                                                     500.00
  7. D. Emergency                                                                                 500.00

Total                                                                                         10,043.00

Commander Yokohama Air Group is at Wotje 1.at.009 Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

May 11, 2009

No. 131

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     November 16, 1941

TO: Washington                                                                                   # 782.

(To be handled in government code.)

Re your # 1083 [a].

1. Please give the following reply to them regarding the question of recognition:

—– the various points in the statement made by the Japanese Government on August 28, which is included in the American oral statement (quote only the points given in the said oral statement) were also included in our proposals of September 6 and 25, and the present cabinet also has no objection to recognizing them as they stand. However, these points have been given on the assumption that the Japanese-American negotiations would reach an agreement. Naturally, therefore, should the negotiations end in a failure, these points would not be binding on Japan alone. We wish to have this clearly understood.

2. Regarding the general question of use of force, the expression “without provocation” was used in the reply of the Japanese Government made on August 28. In the same reply, relative to the Soviet question, we used the words “as long as the Soviet Union remains faithful to the Soviet-Japanese Neutrality Treaty” and then in our proposal of September 6, we used the words “without any justifiable reason.” Now all these expressions mean fundamentally the same thing. The reason for our having gone somewhat into detail concerning the Soviet Union is that we found it necessary to do so in view of the connection between the existence of the Japan-Soviet Neutrality Treaty and the Russo-German war.

In short, we had stipulated the “qualification” which we as an independent country should necessarily and naturally state. It goes without saying that this qualification by no means either limits nor minimizes our peaceful intentions.


[a] See IV, 93-99.

Trans.  11-17-41

No. 132

FROM: Tokyo                                                                                     November 17, 1941

TO: Washington                                                                                   # 783.

Re your # 1110 [a].

We have no objections to have it apply to the entire Pacific area.   Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire  Therefore, we shall not object to your deleting the word “southwestern” from Article 6 of our proposal of 25 September.


[a] Not available.

Trans.  11-17-41

No. 133

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                                             November 17, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1118.

(Part 1 of 5.)

A-70

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

(To be handled in government code.)

On the morning of the 17th at half-past ten, I, accompanied by Ambassador KURUSU, called on Secretary HULL. First HULL said, “After the last war there were no able statesmen; therefore, a situation like the present one came about. What we have to think about now is saving the world from this sort of extremity.” KURUSU replied, “I am in entire agreement with what you say. Fortunately, the United States and Japan, who have not yet participated in this war, have a grave responsibility on their shoulders for working in this direction. However, before we can talk about that, there are some things which have to be settled between Japan and the United States. Still, if we do not engage in concrete negotiations, we cannot get anywhere.” (Then he went on briefly to tell how he had come to the United States at the behest of the Premier and Your Excellency.) Then he continued: “The Premier earnestly hopes for a settlement between Japan and the United States. As a matter of fact, he seems to be rather hopeful beyond expectation. There are at present three problems causing a deadlock between Japan and the United States. They are: Equality in commerce, the Tripartite Agreement, and evacuation. The Premier seems to be very hopeful of a settlement concerning the first two. However, when it comes to the third question—that of evacuation—he seems to entertain great concern.

Trans.  11-21-41

No. 134

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                                             November 18, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1119.

(Strictly secret.)

(Restricted distribution.)

Re my # 1118 [a].

I presented the contents of your messages numbered #782 [b] (?) and #783 [c] to the Secretary of State at the time of our interview on the 17th, in the form of a verbal statement.


[a] (See IV, 133 and 135-137) Ambassador NOMURA’s report of the conference with the President and Secretary HULL on the 17th.

[b] (See IV, 131) Tokyo’s reply to the United States’ oral statement of November 12, regarding the question of recognition and the general question of use of force.http://Louis-j-sheehan.com

[c] (See IV, 132) Tokyo wires Washington that it is all right to delete the word “southwestern” from Article 6 of the proposal of the 25th, thus having it apply to the entire Pacific area.

Trans.  11-22-41

No. 135

FROM: Washington                                                                             November 17, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1118.

(Extremely Urgent.)

(Part 2 of 5.)

Since the time had come to meet the President and since HULL has expressed his wish to continue the conversation in the presence of the President, we all left our seats. Together with Secretary HULL, I went to see the President at 11:00 a.m.

A-71

KURUSU began his conversation by saying, “As I had already told Secretary HULL, the present Cabinet is very much interested in the Japanese-American negotiations.Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire You, Mr. President, as a statesman, no doubt well understand in what frame of mind the Japanese people are after four years of experience in the China incident. While on my way to this country I noticed—though I am not by any means an expert in making such observations—that the situation is militarily strained in Hong Kong, Manila and in other islands. The situation is so tense that we cannot tell when an explosion would occur and, even if it occurred, of what benefit would such a situation be to the United States and Japan? (The President showed that he felt the same way.) To be sure Japan wishes that the Japanese-American negotiations would prove to be a success. However, the time element must be taken into consideration. Delaying the solution avails Japan nothing since in the meantime conditions, both militarily and economically, would become less favorable to her if she is to defend herself. The Premier also seems to be quite hopeful that all of the three questions, namely, that of the Three Power Alliance and Pact and the question of withdrawing troops would be settled. [a] However, he is very much worried over the question of withdrawing troops.”


[a] Translator’s note: Apparently the writer neglected to include in the three questions that of non-discrimination in trade.

Trans.  11-18-41

No. 136

FROM: Washington                                                                             November 17, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1118.

(Part 3 of 5.)

The President: “A long time ago, Secretary of State Bryan once said, ‘There is no last word between friends’.”

“There have been many so-called ‘non-aggression pacts’ in the past, but all of them are now out of date. I believe, however, that by the establishing of some general understanding between the United States and Japan, the situation may be saved.”

Kurusu: “That would seem to be very acceptable from my point of view. From my way of looking at it, apparently the main difficulties in the U. S.-Japanese negotiations to date, have been over the problem of what to do about Japan’s connections with the Tripartite Pact, and what to do about the various claims that the United States has made with regard to the method in which the China Incident should be settled. In the final analysis, it would seem as if adjusting these two points is the main problem at hand at the present time.

“With regard to the Tripartite problem, Japan is bound by certain duties under the terms of that instrument. Moreover, she must consider her dignity and honor as a great power. Because of these considerations, it is impossible for her to violate the terms of the alliance. Since the United States has been strongly insisting right along that international agreements must be adhered to, I   http://Louis-j-sheehan.com  cannot believe that the United States is urging us to do so now. I feel doubly sure of this where the Tripartite Pact is concerned since the basic objectives of that pact are the prevention of the war’s spreading and the maintenance of peace.

“Under these circumstances, it seems as though it should be possible to coordinate and adjust the two problems so as to bring about a settlement. Please understand, however, that no proposal, regardless of how good it may sound, can be accepted by Japan if the terms contained therein cannot be put into effect.”

A-72

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

The President: “With regard to the China problem, I have been advised that Japan finds the withdrawal of troops from China a very difficult undertaking. The United States is not trying to intervene or mediate in the problems of Japan and China. I don’t know whether there is such a word in the parlance of diplomats or not, but the United States’ only intention is to become an ‘introducer’.”

Trans.  11-22-41

No. 137

FROM: Washington                                                                             November 17, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1118.

(Parts 4 and 5 of 5.)

(Part 4.)

Kurusu: “Concerning Japan’s duties to go to war under the terms of the Tripartite Pact, Japan has stated that Japan alone will determine this. The United States apparently interprets this to mean that Japan will wait until the United States is deeply involved in the battle on the Atlantic and then stab the United States in the back. This is not the case. There have been indications in the past that there are those in the United States who have been laboring under the erroneous belief that Japan would move at Germany’s demands; that Japan was merely Germany’s tool. Japan issued the statement that she would act in accordance with Japan’s decisions alone, for the purpose of correcting this misapprehension.

“In any event, if at this time a great understanding between the United States and Japan with regard to the Pacific can be reached as described by the President, such an understanding would far out-shine the Tripartite Pact. Under such circumstances, I feel confident that all doubts you may harbor regarding the application of the Tripartite Pact would automatically and completely melt away.”

At this point, Hull broke in, and after describing Germany’s policy of conquest, said: “Suppose that Germany succeeds in conquering England and then establishes various subservient governments in South America. Suppose after that that Germany attacks the United States with the British fleet. If the United States waits till then, it would be too late regardless of what she tries to do. That is why the United States must prepare her defenses now and this is what the United States calls her rights under defense. There is no reason why Japan cannot see this.”

Thus did Hull go over his theory again.

The President: “The map I referred to in my speech the other day, which described German policy in Central and South America, was an authentic map. Its source was the German Government circles.”

(Part 5.)

Kurusu: “Mr. President, a while ago you made reference to the general relationship between Japan and the United States. As long as we are speaking of peace on the Pacific, and since at least one side of the western hemisphere is on the Pacific, the various countries in Central and South America must be covered when we speak of the Pacific area. It would be impossible for Japan to be a partner in any project aimed at disturbing the peace of the western hemisphere.

“You say that people would give voice to their disapproval should these negotiations lead to a successful settlement between us on the grounds that Japan would be promising the United States peace while on the other hand she would be carrying the spear for Germany. From the beginning, however, the Japanese Government has been saying that should a just peace be established on the Pacific, she would withdraw her troops from French Indo-China. If, therefore, matters progress to that point, this withdrawal should satisfy the general public of the United States as actual proof of Japan’s peaceful intentions.

A-73

“In any event, I am convinced that the immediate objective is to successfully and speedily come to an agreement on the various problems now being discussed at present between Ambassador Nomura and Secretary Hull.”

Hull: “I favor the continuation of these talks. Heretofore, I and Ambassador Nomura have met and talked on numerous occasions but we always seem to come to a certain point and then start going around and around the same circle. I would welcome your—Kurusu—attacking this point from a different angle.”

The President expressed his approval of this, and said: “I am planning to remain in Washington until this Saturday (the 24th). I shall be glad to discuss matters with you and Secretary Hull at any time before then.

Trans.  11-21-41

No. 138

FROM: Washington (Nomura)                                                             November 17, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1121 (?).

Ambassador Kurusu and I expect to confer with the Secretary Hull again at 10 a.m. tomorrow, the 18th.http://Louis-j-sheehan.com

Trans.  11-21-41

No. 139

November 18, 1941

Communications Intelligence Report:

These were the important points:

Date of Operations                                               Serial

October 23-29, 1941                                      19-41, No. 907-100

Oct. 23

“Shinto Maru # 2 who has been previously serving the South China Fleet will probably move into the Mandates in the near future.”

“Comairron 24 and Commander Yokohama Air Group are in Wotje vicinity. Commander Chitose Air Group is at Saipan. Commander Combined Air Force is appearing more frequently in traffic concerning the 24th Airron and with the Fourth Base Force Air Group.”

Oct. 24

“During the evening two unidentified Marus (air tenders) were heard working KONGO MARU (Tender?). Direction-finder bearings indicate these units are probably enroute to the Mandates.” (Marked by asterisk to denote important.)

Oct. 25

“The following units originated movement reports today—Commander # 1 Base Force CinC Third Fleet, Commander Northern Blockade Force, Commander Airron 6 and Commander Airrons Combined Fleet. This may be an indication of a large scale movement or possibly only a few ships in each group. Traffic routing and direction-finding bearings indicate no change in general direction.”

“Shinto Maru #2 is now enroute to the Mandates apparently having Saipan as a destination.”

A-74

THE “MAGIC” BACKGROUND OF PEARL HARBOR

“A new division is now being formed in the 4th Base Force at Truk. The Commander is now aboard an unidentified vessel enroute to Saipan from Truk. Two Maru units are apparently now enroute from the Empire to the Mandates to join this command.”

Oct. 26

“NAGURA(?) (Salvage vessel) has now departed Yokosuka enroute to the Mandates.”

“Considerable confusion now exists on all Mandate circuits, due largely to the extensive use of secret calls. Airron 24 units are continuously active on aircraft frequencies and traffic shows indication of the presence of a part of the Staff of the Combined Air Force command in the Mandates. Air Group Commanders make frequent changes in location, principally between Saipan, Truk, Jaluit and Wotje. Fourth Fleet units are concentrated in Truk area. Traffic indicates an increase in size on the 4th, 5th and 6th Base Force, particularly the 6th. Several additional itinerant marus are now moving toward the Mandates, some of which have previously been active in China waters. Traffic headings have indicated a possible connection between some Third and Fifth Fleet Units with Base Force units in Jaluit area. Occasional dispatches are originated by major units of the First and Second Fleets addressed to Mandate Base Force activities. As a result of the general appearance of traffic the following major units are being watched for a possible move into Mandate area: First Fleet, Second Fleet, Third Fleet, Fifth Fleet, Submarine Force, Combined Air Forces or Air Squadrons, Combined Fleet.” (All marked by asterisk to denote important.)

“MATSUEI MARU—Fourth Fleet repair ship is now at Truk having recently arrived there from Palao area.” Louis J. Sheehan, Esquire

Oct. 28

“Commander Yokohama Air Group is at Wotje (Marshall Islands).”

“Increased radio activity between Mandates Islands and various units of the Combined and Third Fleets have been noted for the past two days possibly indicating movements of additional units to the Mandated area.” (Marked by an asterisk to denote important.)

“Commander Third Base Force—Palao Area and a part of the Third Base Force staff is now aboard the KASHIMA, flagship Fourth Fleet in Truk area.”

Oct. 29

“The KOMOBASHI is now on a course for the Ponape having completed a large irregular circuit around the Marshall Islands.”

No. 140

FROM: Washington                                                                             November 17, 1941

TO: Tokyo                                                                                           # 1127.

The most emphasis in the talks between Hull, myself, and Ambassador Kurusu on the 18th, (lasting about three hours), was placed on matters pertaining to the Triple Alliance. Hull, in his customary manner, denounced the Hitlerian policy of expansion through armed force. He pointed out that as long as Japan is tied up with such a policy through the Tripartite Pact, it would be difficult to adjust Japanese-U. S. relations.

Kurusu then said that it would be impossible to comply if he was demanding of Japan that she abrogate the Tripartite Pact. He also pointed out that the alliance is not aimed at expansion through the force of arms.

Hull said that he was in no position to tell Japan to abrogate the Pact but that as long as there is no substantiating proof of the real aims of the pact, it serves absolutely no purpose.

A-75

Then I and Kurusu explained that it was an impossibility to settle such a basic point in any specified time limit. However, to ease the exceedingly critical situation, the first step would be to mutually return to the situation which existed prior to the date on which the freezing of assets order was put into effect, (in other words, Japan would withdraw from south French Indo-China and the United States would rescind her order to freeze the assets). Talks should then be continued in a more congenial atmosphere, we suggested.

He did not seem particularly receptive to this suggestion. He said that if the government of Japan could make it clear that it wants to pursue a course of peace, then the United States would confer with the British on the subject of returning to the conditions which existed prior to the time that the freezing order went into effect. It is essential, however, that under those conditions, Japan continue to pursue a peaceful policy with ever increasing vigor.

There were indications that Hull, because of his usual cautious nature, was somewhat influenced by the exaggerated reports carried in the press regarding the Premier’s speech in the Diet in which he expressed the three basic principles of international relations and intention of increasing the troops in French Indo China.

Details will be sent in a subsequent message.